CITY OF COTATI

MINUTES for the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission

 

DATE OF MEETING:           October 18, 2004

TIME OF MEETING:            7:00 p.m.

PLACE OF MEETING:         Cotati City Hall, City Council Chambers

                                    201 West Sierra Avenue, Cotati, CA 94931

 

I.          CALL TO ORDER

 

Chairman Dutra called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.

 

II.        ROLL CALL

 

Commissioners Present:           McClelland, Pagnusat, Rock, Dutra

Staff Present:                            Woltering, Lustig, Brisbine

Consultant Present:                  Paul Crawford

 

III.            CHANGES TO THE AGENDA

 

There were no changes to the agenda.

 

IV.            APPROVAL OF MINUTES

 

A.        For the Regular Meeting on September 20, 2004

 

It was moved by Commissioner Pagnusat to approve the minutes of September 20, 2004, as submitted.

Second by Commissioner Pagnusat.

 

Yes:      4          Noes:  0           Absent:  0        Abstain:  0

 

B.         For the Special Meeting on October 5, 2004

 

p. 15, Commissioner McClelland corrected her comment concerning p. 4-4.B from 300 vs. 500 feet to 500 vs. 1,000 feet.

 

It was moved by Commissioner McClelland to approve the minutes of October 5, 2004, as amended.  Second by Chairman Dutra.

 

Yes:      4          Noes:  0           Absent:  0        Abstain:  0

 

V.        ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS

 

Don Moser, Santa Rosa, said that he won a solar design contest in Cotati twenty years ago.  The home he designed wasn’t built and the community, in his opinion, missed a great opportunity in building energy efficient housing.  He encouraged the City to pursue energy conservation measures to bring the Code into the future.  In particular, he discussed the potential for using solar hydrogen as a power source.

 

Anthony Adler, Arthur Street, expressed concern over what he perceived as an unfair public comment process at the last meeting held on October 5, 2004.   While most speakers were allotted three minutes for their presentations, the representative for Monahan Pacific was allowed to speak longer.

 

 

 

VI.      MATTERS AT HAND

 

A.        The Planning Commission will consider a comprehensive update to the entire Land Use Code and Zoning Map, possible related General Plan Amendments, and possible related Municipal Code Amendments, in order to make recommendations to the City Council for adoption (continued from October 5, 2004).

 

            1.         Presentation on the Adoption of a Green Building Ordinance.

 

Armando Navarro, Assistant Director, Sonoma State University’s Environmental Technology Center

 

Bruce Hammond, Chair of the Redwood Empire Chapter of the U.S. Green Building Council

 

Chairman Dutra introduced this agenda item.  He said that at the last meeting on October 5, there were many topics brought up during the public hearing.  Unfortunately, very few people stayed at the meeting to hear the Planning Commission’s deliberations and recommendations.  He encouraged those in attendance to stay for the duration of the meeting in order to see how different items are addressed.

 

Senior Planner Lustig introduced Armando Navarro and Bruce Hammond.

 

Armando Navarro Assistant Director, Sonoma State University’s Environmental Technology Center.  He congratulated the City of Cotati because, if the Council adopts a Sustainable Building Program, it will be the first City in the North Bay to do so.  Mr. Navarro proceeded with his presentation highlighting the many benefits of Green Building.

 

Bruce Hammond, Chair of the Redwood Empire Chapter of the U.S. Green Building Council, expressed appreciation for the opportunity that he had to promote the benefits of Green Building while on the Planning Commission and for the positive reception by the Planning Commission and City Council.

 

Chairman Dutra expressed appreciation to both speakers for their presentations and thanked them for their continued efforts towards public education.

 

Planning Director Woltering introduced the continued review of the Land Use Code update.

 

Senior Planner Lustig reviewed in detail the staff responses to the public comment received on October 5, 2004, and the resulting recommendations for change to both the Land Use Code document and the Zoning Map.  A written summary of those responses and recommendations are contained within the staff report as Attachments 3 and 4.  In addition, staff referenced correspondence received and how it was addressed and/or what recommendations staff had.  Those comments are also included in the staff report.

 

In addition to this information, the Planning Commission was provided with a table that identifies a comparison of uses allowed by the existing C-1, General Commercial, zoning district and the proposed new C-D, Downtown Commercial, zoning district.  Based on discussion at the last meeting on October 5, 2004, staff recommended that Grocery Stores and Specialty Foods (under 10,000 square feet in size) be included as permitted.   On page 2-37, findings for allowing 2nd floor uses on the ground floor are provided.  The uses would be limited to no more than 40% of the block, based on building frontage.

 

Chairman Dutra inquired about the elimination of antique car sales from the list of allowable uses in the CD zone.  In particular, he wanted to know how the change would impact the property located on Old Redwood Highway, near George Street, that has cars for sale.

 

Senior Planner Lustig noted that that particular property has no permits for the sale of cars.  She also noted that only the sale of “antique” cars was allowed by Use Permit.

 

Planning Director Woltering suggested that if the Planning Commission decides to eliminate the use from the CD district, there may be a time before adoption of the new Code where staff could work with the property owner towards legalizing the use.  Such a process would need to occur in the very immediate future with staff determining the level of design and improvements that would be acceptable at that location.  Consideration would also need to be given to the property’s proximity to the northern gateway.

 

Also in response to an inquiry from Chairman Dutra, Planning Director Woltering said that limited term Conditional Use Permit’s are not recommended in order to phase the use out over time, because they are impossible to enforce.  He suggested that the matter could be addressed further by the City Council.

 

Senior Planner Lustig proceeded with her review of the correspondence received, and staff’s comments and recommendations.

 

Chairman Dutra called for a break at 8:50 p.m.

The meeting was reconvened at 9:00 p.m.

 

Chairman Dutra invited Planning Commission comment on outstanding issues or recommendations for changes.

 

Vice Chairman Rock suggested that undergrounding of utilities along adjoining street frontages be required, where feasible, of new construction, whether or not the lines feed the project.  Senior Planner Lustig

agreed to present the concept to the City Council.

 

Vice Chairman Rock requested that high-volume flyash be included as an alternative to asphalt for driveways.

 

Senior Planner Lustig suggested that the option be included in the Resolution rather than the Code so that it would be easier to change.  She also suggested that perhaps the City Standards and Specifications could include flyash as alternative to asphalt as well.

 

The Planning Commission’s ultimate decision was to amend §17.36.100(E), p. 3-65, to include high-volume flyash as an alternative surface for access driveways.

 

p. 5-31, Table 5-2, Vice Chairman Rock suggested increasing the tree replacement ratios from 1, 2 & 4 to 2, 4 & 6.  He also suggested that the City provide an approved tree list.

 

Commissioner Pagnusat requested additional information on the prohibition for internally illuminated signs (§17.38.040) and asked how the policy originated.  He cited existing cases where externally lit signs, with their lights aiming up from the ground, have more impact to the night sky than an internally illuminated sign would have.

 

Senior Planner Lustig responded that the policy has been in place since she has been here, and believes it originated with a desire to adhere to the desired rural character and craftsman design style.  She suggested that staff could arrange for an expert to give a presentation on the environmental impacts associated with light leakage in the near future.

 

p. 3-81, I-6:  Land Use Consultant Crawford suggested new language to address an inconsistency as follows:

 

Amended Language:  No lamp that exceeds 15 watts shall be placed so that the lamp is visible from a public right-of-way or adjacent property.

 

p. 6, Exhibit A, Resolution No. PC 04-29:  Commissioner McClelland recommended deleted the words “to meet”.

 

Chairman Dutra opened the PUBLIC HEARING at 9:28 p.m.

 

Bob Fleak, Golden State Manufactured Home Owners League, stated support for the adoption of a Mobilehome Park Conversion Ordinance and provided copies of three newspaper articles on the topic.  The proposed ordinance would provide protection to mobilehome park residents if the mobilehome park was converted to another residential use.  He also provided a copy of a Mobilehome Park Conversion Ordinance and a Mobilehome Park Overlay District adopted by the City of Rohnert Park; and a similar ordinance that is the adoption process at the City of Sonoma.

 

Marion Koglin, Hillview Drive/Sierra Mobilehome Park, reviewed her and her neighbor’s letter dated October 15, 2004, that had been provided in the Planning Commission packet.   In their letter, they requested a Mobilehome Park Overlay zone on each of the three mobilehome parks in Cotati and a provision in the Land Use Code for 600 square feet of open space per mobilehome unit.  The letter also poses questions on allowable density within the Sierra Mobilehome Park, and cites sections within the existing Zoning Ordinance that could be considered for inclusion in the new Land Use Code.

 

Gregory Crisp, property owner, owns the property located at the intersection of West Sierra Avenue and West School Street.  The property was addressed in the staff report with staff recommending a possible new zoning district of Limited Community Commercial.  Mr. Crisp stated his opposition to a Rural land use designation and said that the proposed new zoning district was reflective of his views as to the use of the property.  He recognized the new zoning district as a compromise that attempts to address both his and the City’s needs.  He was somewhat concerned with the number of uses that would require a Conditional Use Permit because of the cost, but recognized the need for them.  He wanted to reserve the right to continue working with staff on the options for his property.

 

Clifton Davenport, Cypress Avenue, discussed his concerns about the proposed rezoning of a large parcel on Cypress Avenue near West Sierra Avenue from a Rural zoning to a NL, Neighborhood Low, zoning.  He was concerned about the impacts of development on existing habitat, preservation of trees, and impacts to the creek system.

 

Mr. Davenport said that the list of properties to be rezoned shows his AP# but an incorrect address.  The correct information is AP# 144-391-023, 8584 Cypress Avenue.

 

Senior Planner Lustig explained that the proposed rezoning is to bring the property into consistency with the General Plan.  Environmental impacts, including preservation issues, would be studied with any future development proposal.  She said that the Planning Commission could consider a General Plan Amendment instead, but creek setbacks and the Ridgeline Ordinance will limit density on this property.

 

John Clifford, Colvin Group, discussed the proposed Affordable Housing/Inclusionary requirements.  He did not agree with staff that many communities in California require that 20% of the total units be inclusionary units.  He stated his opinion that many communities only require 10-12%.  He also said that Cotati’s proposed requirement that all of the inclusionary units be built, without a provision for in-lieu fees, is also unique.  The three levels of affordability are also problematic and in his opinion could cause the City to not get the affordable units its striving for.  He suggested that the three tiers be re-considered to allow for more flexibility.

 

Senior Planner Lustig responded that the changes in the affordable housing regulations are actually implementing the Housing Element.  Any changes in the Land Use Code would require amendment to the Housing Element as well. 

 

Neil Hancock, Arthur Street, thanked the Planning Commission for their proposed changes to the zoning map with regard to his property. 

 

Patty Minnis, Olaf Street, was glad to see that Olaf  Street was to remain residential, and, expressed her opinion that Henry, Charles and William Streets should be protected as primarily residential also.

 

Roberta Cox (name unclear), read a letter into the record.  The letter is dated October 15, 2004, and was prepared by her mother’s attorney, Molly Dillon of Clement, Fitzpatrick & Kenworthy.  Her mother is Anna Young, downtown property owner.  The letter had also been provided in the Planning Commission packets.  The letter outlines Ms. Young’s concerns about the proposed Land Use Code’s restriction that would allow only retail uses on the ground floor.

 

Dean Barberio, Arthur Street, thanked the Planning Commission for their proposed changes to the zoning map with regard to his property.

 

He was concerned, however, about the proposed rezoning from R-2 to NM, and asked how that rezoning would affect his ability to have two units on the lot.

 

Senior Planner Lustig clarified that two separate units would require a Conditional Use Permit.

 

Chris Inman, Rainbow Bridge School on William Street, agreed with a previous speaker that William, Henry and Charles Streets are primarily residential and should be given the same protection as Olaf, Arthur, and George Streets. 

 

He encouraged the review and expansion of permitted uses in the CD, Downtown Commercial, zoning district, because retail uses have a difficult time surviving.

 

He said that his property located at 21 William Street has two buildings on it.  He confirmed with staff that the rear building could continue to be used as a residence, with the building in front being used for commercial.

 

Victor Gonzalez, Monahan Pacific/South Sonoma Capital Partners, reviewed his written comments in a letter dated October 18, 2004.  He said that only seven communities in California require  20% inclusionary units, and only two have no provision for inclusionary buy-out.

 

Mr. Gonzalez’s written comments outline several sections in the Draft Land Use Code, specifically related to the CG, Commercial-Gravenstein Corridor, that in his opinion directly effect the properties owned by Monahan Pacific and don’t promote the goals of the General Plan.

 

Concerning energy efficiency requirements, Mr. Gonzalez suggested that a more effective way to reduce energy consumption was to have a grant or loan program to retrofit existing older homes that are not energy efficient.

 

Chris Inman, William Street, asked if the proposed rezonings would result in higher property tax assessments.  Staff did not believe that it would.

 

Carl Schollman, Pine Lane, said that he agreed with the proposed rezoning of the Crisp property at the intersection of West Sierra and West School Street to Limited Community Commercial.

 

Concerning his property on Old Redwood Highway, Mr. Schollman said that he had submitted a plan at one time to legalize the auto sales.  He was, however, delayed by negotiations with an adjoining property owner.  He indicated that he wants to move forward with an application as soon as possible and arrange for a meeting with staff.

 

Chairman Dutra closed the PUBLIC HEARING at 10:33 p.m.

 

The Planning Commissioners agreed that the remaining topics to be discussed included what to do about the Crisp property at West Sierra and West School Streets; the allowable uses in the Downtown Commercial zoning district; the proposed Mobilehome Park Overlay Zone; and zoning changes in the La Plaza area.

 

At some point in the future, the Planning Commission agreed that they would like to review the inclusionary housing requirements.  For now, however, they chose to stay with the requirements of the Housing Element.

 

Corner of West Sierra Avenue and West School Street (Crisp Property)

 

The Planning Commission concurred with staff’s recommendations concerning a possible new Limited Community Commercial zoning for this property.

 

Planning Director Woltering said that staff will continue to work out the details of the proposed new zoning district prior to it being presented to the City Council.  He clarified that the zoning would apply only to the corner lot.  The adjacent lot would remain Rural and be redesignated in the General Plan.

 

Mobilehome Park Overlay Zone

 

It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to recommend an amendment to the Land Use Code to provide for a Mobilehome Park Overlay zone that would be applied to the three existing mobilehome parks in Cotati.  In addition, they supported an open space requirement of 600 square feet per mobilehome unit. They also agreed that they would be receptive to a Mobilehome Conversion Ordinance to be presented by staff in the future.

 

Planning Director Woltering agreed to meet with State representatives to work out the questions about density within the mobilehome parks, and will review the Mobilehome Conversion Ordinances provided.

 

Uses in the CD, Downtown Commercial, zoning district

 

To assist in the review of uses, the Planning Commission referred to Attachment 6 of the staff report, a

Comparison of uses allowed by the existing C-1 zoning district and the Downtown Commercial (CD) Zone.

 

The Commission consensus was to:

 

Recommend that groceries and specialty food stores under 10,000 square feet be permitted in the CD, CE, and CG Districts;

 

Antique Stores should be allowed with a Minor Conditional Use Permit in the CD, CE, and CG Districts;

 

Furniture and Appliance stores should require a Conditional Use Permit; and,

 

The findings recommended by staff for allowing 2nd floor uses on the ground floor are acceptable.

 

Cypress/Valparaiso Avenue Rezoning (AP# 144-391-011, 10+ acres)

 

Senior Planner Lustig explained that the proposed rezoning to NL is to bring the zoning into conformance with the General Plan Land Use Designation of Low-Medium Density.  Any other zoning would require a General Plan Amendment.  Addressing concerns brought up during the public hearing, she explained that density on this property would be limited by the Hillside/Ridgeline development regulations, the Tree Preservation/Protection regulations, and by required creek setbacks. 

 

The Commission discussed the possibility of rezoning the property to NL now, and then reconsider the General Plan designation during the General Plan update process.  Planning Director Woltering recommended leaving the existing zoning so that a developer’s expectations would not be raised.

 

Commissioner McClelland stated support for changing the General Plan designation to Low Density and the zoning to RVL (Residential Very Low).  The other Commissioners agreed resulting in a consensus.

 

* * * *

 

Senior Planner Lustig summarized the Planning Commission’s recommended changes and requests from this meeting as follows:

 

1.         p. 3-21, §17.30.100:  Land Use Consultant Crawford recommended, and the Planning Commission agreed to, the following amendment to the language:

 

Underground installation by the developer is required for:  all electric, telecommunications, and utility lines providing service to sites and structures on the site, and any of these lines that traverse the site, and for all junction and distribution boxes, transformers, and similar facilities.

 

2.         p. 3-65, §17.36.100(E):  Section amended to include high-volume flyash as an alternative surface for access driveways.

 

3.         Staff, with City Council direction, will arrange for a professional presentation on issues related to the impacts of lighting and lighting options.

 

4.         p. 5-31, Table 5.2:  The required tree replacement ratios were recommended to be increased as follows:

                       

12 to 49 inches             1  2

                        50 to 79 inches             2  4

                        80 or more inches        4  6

 

5.         p. 3-81, §17.38.050, Sign Lighting (I-6):  The Commission recommended that the section be modified as follows:

 

Existing Language:  Reflective-type bulbs and incandescent lamps that exceed 15 watts shall not be used so as to expose the face of the bulb or lamp to a public right-of-way or adjacent property.

 

Amended Language:  No lamp that exceeds 15 watts shall be placed so that the lamp is visible from a public right-of-way or adjacent property.

 

6.         Resolution No. PC 04-29, Exhibit A (K):  remove the words “to meet”.

 

7.         Planning Commission concurred with staff’s recommendation for the Crisp property at the corner of West Sierra and West School Street, and, after reviewing the proposed uses, agreed to recommend the creation of a new zoning district called Limited Community Commercial. 

 

8.         Regarding permitted and conditional uses in the CD, Downtown Commercial, zoning district, Planning Commission agreed with staff’s recommendations including the following:

 

·       On Table 2-3, p2-17, Groceries, specialty foods under 10,000 square feet shall be a permitted use in the CD, CE and CG Districts. 

 

·       Antique Stores are allowed with a Minor Conditional Use Permit in all three commercial zones.

 

9.         Planning Commission agreed to recommend to City Council a Mobile Home Park (MHP) overlay zone for the three existing mobilehome parks in the City.  The Planning Commission was receptive to considering a Mobilehome Park Conversion Ordinance in the future.

 

In addition, the Planning Commission recommended that a 600 square foot per unit open space area be a requirement for mobilehome parks.

 

 

 

10.        Regarding the large property (10+ acres) on Cypress Avenue near W. Sierra Avenue, (AP# 144-391-011), the Planning Commission recommended  leaving the existing rural (RVL) zoning and changing the General Plan land use map to Low Density residential.

 

11.        Planning Commission recommended that the proposed zoning map be amended, for

AP#’s 144-040-013 and 144-040-017 to be consistent with the General Plan. These parcels are located behind CG parcels along Gravenstein Highway, and accessed on Alder Avenue.

 

12.        Planning Commission acknowledged that their action includes approval of all of the insert pages.

 

* * * *

It was moved by Commissioner McClelland to adopt Resolution No. PC 04-28 Recommending the City Council Approve the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the 2004 Land Use Code, Zoning Map and General Plan Amendments Including Land Use Map and Text, as amended.  Second by Commissioner Pagnusat.

 

Yes:      4          Noes:  0           Absent:  0        Abstain:  0

 

It was moved by Commissioner Pagnusat to adopt Resolution No. PC 04-29, as amended, Recommending the City Council Approve Amendments to the Cotati General Plan Land Use Map and Text and Recommending Redesignating Certain Parcels to Recognize Existing Land Uses and Clarify Intent.  Second by Chairman Dutra.

 

Yes:      4          Noes:  0           Absent:  0        Abstain:  0

 

It was moved by Vice Chairman Rock to adopt Resolution No. PC 04-30, as amended, Recommending the City Council Repeal Cotati Municipal Code Title 17, the Ordinances Codified Therein, Including But Not Limited to Ordinance No. 149, Ordinance No. 303, and the Zoning Map; Adopt a New Comprehensive Land Use Code and New Zoning Map; Repeal Chapters 11.12 and 14.30 of the Municipal Code; and Rezone Certain Properties.  Second by Chairman Dutra.

 

Yes:      4          Noes:  0           Absent:  0        Abstain:  0

 

It was moved by Chairman Dutra to adopt Resolution No. PC 04-36, as amended, Recommending the City Council Adopt Amendments to the Cotati General Plan Land Use Map to Recognize Existing Land Uses and Clarify Intent.  Second by Commissioner McClelland.

 

Yes:      4          Noes:  0           Absent:  0        Abstain:  0

 

It was moved by Chairman Dutra to adopt Resolution No. PC 04-37, as amended, Recommending that the City Council Adopt the Sustainable Building Program for the City of Cotati.  Second by Vice Chairman Rock.

 

Yes:      4          Noes:  0           Absent:  0        Abstain:  0

 

 

VII.      REPORTS BY STAFF

 

There were no reports by staff.

 

VIII.    REPORTS BY COMMISSION

 

There were no reports from the Commission.

 

IX.            ADJOURNMENT

 

Chairman Dutra adjourned the meeting at 11:20 p.m.

 

 

* * * *

Submitted by:

Kathleen Brisbine, Administrative Secretary